If you’re releasing a DVD or CD, you would likely have searched online for a company to get your content duplicated or replicated on the disc. As a result, you’ll be bombarded by several websites offering these services on the internet. But is there any difference between disc duplication and disc replication, and does that even matter? The answer is a yes.
Most people believe that CD/DVD replication is synonymous with CD/DVD duplication, which isn’t exactly true. Both the procedures are different from one another. So, what’s the difference, and which process should you opt for?
Well, before you pick between these two methods, you need to first decide on some factors like:
- What’s the time scale you have at hand for producing the content?
- What’s the run length you need?
- What’s your budget?
- Does the aesthetic appearance matter?
The difference between Disc Replication and Disc Duplication:
In case of disc replication, the company offering this service will first evaluate the master disc you supply. After verifying that the master disc doesn’t contain any kinds of errors, a glass master of all your data is created, which, in turn, produces stampers. These stampers are loaded into a mold, where the discs are used for built. A good-quality glass master produces replicas that are also of the same quality. To put it in simple words, one can say that replicated CDs or DVDs are clones of the original, sans any quality loss.
The disc duplication process is pretty similar to disc burning on PCs or drives. A company offering this service creates one master disc that is later burnt into hundreds of discs. The main difference is the no. of burning capacity a CD/DVD duplication facility has. They are capable of burning hundreds of discs in one shot. However, if you do this process yourself at home, you will spend days getting done with it.
Ideally, disc duplication and disc replication deliver the same quality. But, replicated discs, undoubtedly, have better quality if an expert creates the glass master.
Pros of replication:
- More cost-effective
- Longer run lengths can be produced
Cons of replication:
- The turnaround time is 10-12 working days, generally
- It isn’t cost-effective in short runs
Pros of duplication:
- The turnaround time is 1-3 working days
- Cost-effective on short runs
Cons of duplication:
- Results may not be as professional as the replicated disc
- Isn’t cost-effective on larger runs
Which process is better?
As mentioned above, the CD/DVD replication and duplication methods have their set of advantages and disadvantages. Ultimately, the customer needs and budget help decide between the two methods.
The disc duplication process is faster and has a quick turnaround time of 1-3 days. On the other hand, disc replication can take around 10-12 days to deliver your discs. But, duplication has a higher price per piece, while replication would cost you relatively less than duplication. And as many companies that offer these services use advanced technologies and equipment, the quality won’t be a matter of concern.
Ideally, it’s best to opt for replication services if the order is more than 1000 copies. But in case of duplication, you can place an order for even 100 copies or less. There is no minimum order limit in disc duplication as most of the process is automated. As such, duplication services are best suited for business owners who are seeking less volume of copies. However, if you want to place an order for more than 1000 copies, disc replication services are always the best choice, and you also have a chance to get them at lower rates.
If you are still confused, a company offering CD/DVD duplication and replication service can help you choose a better option. Learning as much as you can about these processes would help you make the right decision based on your project demands and budget restrictions.